Wednesday, October 2, 2013

World War Z Review

“World War Z” is a zombie thriller that lacks a bite

How many zombie movies need to be made before the genre becomes stale?  Apparently Hollywood isn’t done milking the undead cash cow yet, as this summer saw the release of “World War Z,” one of many zombie movies to come out in the years since the huge success of AMC’s “The Walking Dead” reinvigorated interest in the genre. 

The hype for this movie was understandably big, since it is based on the highly praised novel of the same name in addition to having Brad Pitt in front of and behind the camera as a producer.  Unfortunately, numerous production problems plagued the project, and it shows in the finished film.  What we have instead, is an underwhelming run-of-the-mill summer action flick than a fully realized adaptation.

The story of “World War Z” plays out like almost every other zombie film you’ve seen before.  A virus pops up that turns people into killing machines, spreading across the globe while a former government official tries to protect his family while on a globe-trotting crusade to find a cure for the pandemic.  The main plot points are so redundant that you could make a checklist of material from other zombie and pandemic media, and “World War Z” would fulfill almost every one of them.

A montage of news coverage on the start of the infection during the opening credits?  Check.  Scenes of our main characters’ perfect life before the chaos hits them?  Check.  A scene where the hero finds a seemingly safe haven only to see it come crashing down in a matter of minutes despite all his warnings?  Check.  The list goes on and on.

Despite the fast pace of the movie and constant action, there’s a distinct lack of tension in “World War Z.”  This can be attributed to two things.  

The first is the toned down violence in the movie.  It’s glaringly obvious that serious cuts were made in order to get the box-office-success-guaranteed PG-13 rating.  In spite of all the violence that occurs in “World War Z”, there is little to no blood in the movie.  Considering that this is a genre that pretty much thrives on guts and gore, and that much more gruesome zombie violence is shown on TV, it really takes the grit out of a movie that could seriously benefit from it.
The second aspect hindering the film’s tension is Brad Pitt’s constant presence throughout.  That’s not a knock against Pitt’s performance, he does well enough with what he’s given, but no matter how bad the situations get in the movie you know he’s going to walk away from them.  He’s usually the sole survivor of a major attack, and every other nameless character he comes across is just fodder for the zombies.

Speaking of the zombies in this movie, they’re probably the most interesting part of the whole film.  The writers put an interesting twist on the way the zombies behave.  Instead of devouring their victims, they simply bite them and move on, causing people to turn in a matter of 12 seconds (the movie literally counts the time for the audience), thus causing the infection’s rapid spread.  They’re also a little more intelligent than your normal flesh-craving animal, as they can figure out how to get to their prey by doing things like breaking windows and forming giant piles to get over walls. 

They reminded me a lot of the velociraptors from “Jurassic Park,” which in turn reminded me that I could be watching a much better movie.

It should be a noted that the film is resolved by an act of sheer dumb luck, further cementing Pitt’s character as an invincible force, and the closing narration leaves the movie open for a sequel.  If this does occur, and the sequel only consists of more of this, you can count me out.

For all of the major problems in “World War Z,” it’s never boring.  The action is well staged and the final sequence at a medical facility is genuinely eerie, invoking chilling memories of playing the old “Resident Evil” games. 

To the film’s credit I’ve never read the original book, but I really want to now, as I’ve heard so many good things about it.  It’s just a shame that the movie feels more like a heavily manufactured victim of the current Hollywood process than a great adaptation of supposedly great source material.  At its best, “World War Z” is a decent rainy Friday night rental and a redundant wasted opportunity at its worst. 
Proceed with caution.

Rating: 2.5/5 Stars
Like on Facebook
Follow on Twitter

No comments:

Post a Comment